Growing Popularity of Women in Rugby in America Essay

Growing Popularity of Women in Rugby in America - Essay ExampleWomen rarely participated in contact sports. The chance availed itself and they streamed in extended numbers to play the sport. The history of women rugby in America is colorful since it started in 1972, and underwent various changes and challenges but only popularized in 1993. Rugby enables women to play by the rules of men and display their physiological bearing just like men do. This is a property that endears women to the game. It is common knowledge that rugby requires extreme physical strength due to the violence involved. Physical strength is associated with men.Females even at work places are offered light jobs that require little physical strength. Femininity is associated with physical flunk and minimal violence. As women play rugby, they display physical strength as they defend their territories by locking arms and elbows. Similar to male rugby players they comport pride in their bruises and injuries incur red from the violence of the game. This seems out of order because many women would prefer to remain unburies and scar less.Women normally played basket ball, soft ball and explosion ball over the years. The sports require energy but not as much energy as rugby. The women therefore gained a sport which they use to strain their physical abilities to the maximum (Brown, M., Growden, G., & Guthrie, P. (2011). There are few limitations on the physical abilities in rugby, the stronger the better. The physical ability however is not limited by the physical appearance of an individual. The sport is ideal for any body type. After refining physical and technical prowess, there is a part for every person to englut in the team.This should also be accompanied with aggressiveness and violence, the nature of women is that they are good listeners and they pay attention to details. This aspect of femininity complements them a great deal. Trainers contain that women pay more attention during tra ining compared to men (Rawson, S & Nahman, N, 2005). They are